Search This Blog

Showing posts with label omnibus bill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label omnibus bill. Show all posts

Saturday, June 2, 2018

The List: Hundreds of Millions of Pork in the $1.5 Billion 2018 Final Spending Bill only 7 Republicans Voted No

The 2018 bonding bill was $825 million dollars. Titled, HF4404SF4013 it passed the house 84 to 39. Action 4 Liberty documented the votes and only 4 republican legislators voted against the bill in the house. Cal Bahr, Steve Drazkowski, Steve Greene, and Jeremy Munson. None from Washington County. The bill didn't pass the Senate with a 34 to 33 vote at first because there's thankfully a requirement to have a three fifths approval. Not one republican Senator voted no on the massive spending bill where over half the money goes to State colleges to build recreation areas, community halls, and other impressive eight figure buildings. No strings attached cash. Nothing about lowering tuition or other student costs; focusing on degrees or trades that have shortages (ie: professions they can get a job in). 

However, just hours before session ended Republicans opened the flood gates to allow what appeared to be any spending request to get this bill to pass wrapped up with a lot of the spending projects that failed to pass in the Capital Investment Project bill we covered earlier in May. The spending totals $1.5 billion dollars and was rushed through the house and senate without resistance. The Bill was HF4425 This was documented by Action 4 Liberty. It had so much wasteful spending most of the house democrats voted yes! It passed in the house 113 to 17, with only 7 republicans voting no. That is, Cal Bahr, Steve Drazkowski, Steve Greene, Eric Lucero, Joe McDonald, Marion O'Neil, and Jeremy Munson. It passed in the Senate 42-25 with every republican voting yes.

Governor Dayton signed this $1.5 billion dollar spending bill with $825 million of it in bonding debt. 

In 2017, the House and Senate republicans passed a billion dollar bonding bill which the Governor signed. Worst of all, it was a non-bonding year. Every other year is reserved for bonding (or debt) spending. The house members to vote no were:  Cal Bahr, Drew Christensen, Steve Drazkowski, Steve Green, Eric Lucero, Joe McDonald, Tim Miller, Marion O'neill, and Duane Quam. Again, not one person from Washington County. (Jeremy Munson was not in office yet if you're wondering why the lack of a no vote from him).

So what's in these pork bills is hard to exactly follow as the legislature does a horrible job explaining what comes and goes into the bills and when they meld to bigger and bigger bills like this 998 page beast. Especially in conference Committees. Unless you are there in person it's impossible to know. One thing is for certain, things are not being taken out... Things are being rammed in. Safe to say the First reading is a modest version of the bill that the Senate was unable to pass and certainly the $1.5 billion dollar version that eventually passed. Here's all the projects that stood out as "what the hell are you funding that with State tax dollars for?" In other words, "if that's SO important than the local areas that are getting the funding should pay" or simply that it's insane to fund such a thing... especially from Republicans who are supposed to be fiscally responsible. A great filter is asking "Is this a CORE function of government?" 

Minnesota consistently ranks as one of the worst tax friendly States... and it's all related to the out of control spending like this bill. It's one of many multi billion dollar omnibus bills that make up our State's nearly $50 billion dollar budget.

Also added after the bonding list here are projects that were not in the failed senate Capital investment bill we covered earlier in May.

2018 Omnibus (bonding) bill spending pork:

-$298 million to the UofM for infrastructure like buildings. It's no strings attached for good ideas like to lower tuition or stop building 8 figure art and music halls with the hard earned tax money. This bill, for example had $24 million to restore one Pillsbury hall building.
-$274 million to the equally unaccountable Minnesota State Colleges and Universities for the same kind of projects 
-$14 million to Red Lake School district to connect an elementary school to a middle school. They have a reading proficiency of 4% (reading proficiency for grade 4 at Ponemah Elementary in 2017 on MCA3 scores. Proficient means they can read as one could expect for that grade with the low bar of the state) , But the Legislature's solution is to throw money at them for a building... instead of teacher accountability reform or school choice options.
-$4 Million for a Perpich Center for the Arts
-$21 million dollars to renovate a laboratory building at the department of Agriculture... 
-$13.7 million to preserve and improve exhibits at the Minnesota Zoo
-$21 million to the Minnesota Zoo most of the funds to repurpose the monorail.... how about a cost neutral option of offering a contractor to remove the pure steel super structure free of charge and allowing them to take the steel for scrap. That's how much of the Brown's creek trail in Stillwater was paid for from the scrap rail road tracks.
-$4 million for an Amateur sports Commission
-$13.7 million to the Minnesota Zoological Garden 
-$9 million to purchase "two aircraft" $7.2 million of it is being taken from road funds!
-$50 million to the Un-elected Metropolitan Council to expand failed bus lines of their choosing... The money should be spent with stand alone bills for proposed projects like our road projects are. We don't just give MNDOT tens or hundreds of millions and say to go do what they want. At the least they should let the experts in Bus service at Metro Transit decide because they have proven studies and calculations to determine route use called the Service Improvement plans. The Met Council's strategy is to expand as many lines as possible at the same time to create lines that need funding indefinitely check out the latest failure of the Met C in bus planning here.
-$50 million to the Un-elected Metropolitan Council to build a "Heywood II bus garage" in Minneapolis
-$14 million to build two secure living units for sex offenders in St. Peters... this is not related to the $8.8 million for the second phase of a different building for the sex offenders in St. Peter that we covered in the 2018 Capital Investment pork bill
-ONLY $13 million for the veteran homes in Minneapolis, Hastings, Fergus Falls, Silver Bay, Luverne, and Little Falls...
-$16 million for new plumbing and ventilation at the St. Cloud prison... anyone else not care if prisoners have to shower with cold water and live with bad ventilation?
-$15 million for public housing for low income... how about welfare reform and the thousands of units of existing low income housing can be temporary solutions until they're self sustaining again? Faster recovery opens up units. 
-$40 million for the Minnesota Historical Society... core function of government?
-ONLY $500,000 for cemeteries for Veterans across the whole state and it comes with small print saying the  "veterans cemeteries, to be operated by the commissioner of veterans affairs. The commissioner also must seek donations of land for the cemeteries."
Middle of nowhere trails:
-$2.6 million trail in New London (population 1,200, middle of no where far west of cities)
-$3.3 million for trail from Detroit Lakes (pop. 8K to Frazee pop 1,300)
-$3.5 million for "mountain bike system" in Cuyuna Country rec area by Crosby MN (pop. 3,000) 
-$1.6 million trail out of Little Falls (pop 8k)
-$3.5 million for "continued development" of underground mine park facilities in Lake Vermilion 
-$3.1 million for a trail through Tofte MN on far north shore (population 226 people!)

Some of the added pork to make the $1.5 billion dollar version:
$1.9 million to build a bear exhibit at the Duluth Zoo that couldn't even take care of it's Polar bears after flooding allowed a bear to escape in 2012 they closed it down and moved the bears out. 
$1.3 million dollars for the start of a trail near the hospital in ELY (population 3,390)
$1.5 million to add to the already 200 mile long ATV trail that winds through rural Aitkin County
$1.3 million for a recreation area in Babbitt (pop 1,400)
$1.4 million for Hennepin County Center for the arts
$514,000 for a public radio station tower in Trout Lake Township (population 1,087 people)
$15 million for Minneapolis to redevelop a Harbor Terminal for the public (initially they were to get $12 million)
$3 million for a food bank in Crookston (pop 5,800)
$1.8 million to Silver Bay to put a park on the recently public "black beach" (pop 1,800)
$4.5 million to renovate one rec center in St. Paul
$400,000 to study "insect productivity" for fish.
$200,000 to sonar map muscle habitat in St Croix/Mississippi river way
$400,000 to study alternatives to road salt... (it's free to ask the dozens of no salt cities and counties across the Country for data on salt alternatives)
$300,000 to public TV to make videos on conservation
$550,000 so 17 acres in Morris MN (pop 5,200) can teach about pollinators (like bees) Could they have found a more isolated and remote city in the State?
$1 million for new international wolf center exhibits
$550,000 to increase diversity in environmental jobs
$350,000 to study and develop "solar window concentrators" (sounds like a job for the private sector)
$550,000 to write a guidebook on storing renewable energy
$310,000 to develop "bio-mulch" for gardens
$750,000 to research "new technology lawnmowers" original language said "autonomous pasture mower and solar charging station"
$400,000 to assess using invertebrates as a food source for animals in the Praire Pothole area of the State.
$2.2 million for a Swedish Immigrant trail section near Taylor Falls MN (pop 1,000)
$338,000 to research if bison can restore oak savannah wildlife area
$1 million dollar trail in Cohasset (pop 2,600) 
$2 million to improve a boat launch in Grand Marais 
$2.5 million for part 3 of 4 on a trail in La Crescent (pop 4,800)
$1.1 million for a trail "near" Tower MN (pop 400) 


Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Speaker Daudt Blindsides Transportation Omnibus and Takes Out Met Council Oversight


Yesterday on 5/9/2017, in the dark of night at 10pm, the ten legislative members of the House and Senate Transportation Conference committee came together and made more adjustments to the Transportation omnibus bill. The meeting was scheduled for the morning and than moved later and later into the night. This $5.8 Billion dollar bill has a lot of needed funding for roads; but it's growing worse and worse with each meeting. Our last post covered this: GOP Caves on Mass Transit, Offers Dayton Dream Budget for the Met Council to Continue Transit Lines

As the title states, the GOP is not only funding the Met Council a raise to a total two year budget of $210.8 million, they are no longer taking away their power to keep bypassing the legislature regarding mass transit corridors. Before this action the meeting was going as planned. The committee members were rubber stamping small changes to the Bill passing "A17-0443.pdf" unanimously. They also approved unanimously the "DE amendment as amended". These amendments included things like the requirement for the Met Council to do a vibration study for the South West Light Rail (section 151). They also added that the Governor can appoint 1 member to the Met Council. There appears to be more items to work through before the house and senate versions fully match according to this DE document.

The meeting took a turn for the worse when Senator Newman introduced a request to approve an oral amendment to remove sections 125, 128, and 138 from the omnibus bill, starting on p.111. These measures were Representative Runbeck's and Senator Osmek's bill HF418/SF150 that was later included into the omnibus bill under these sections. The proposal was a requirement that no light rail corridor can be "studied, planned, designed, or constructed unless the legislature has explicitly authorized the particular project." This common sense measure would have returned the power to build these multi billion dollar white elephant transit corridors back to the State tax payers who fund them (with their elected legislators). 

The vote appeared to only take representative Runbeck and Senator Osmek by surprise. They were the only two no votes. Runbeck said in the meeting she spoke to the Transportation Commission Chair Representative Torkelson on the House floor earlier in the day and he stated to her the plan was to keep the measures in place. She asked for clarification and the room was silent as she and Osmek appeared to realize they were intentionally left out of the discussion. When it came time for representative Koznick to vote he "passed" and after the rest of the yes votes were counted he too sold out his principles to Speaker Kurt Daudt's selfish political ambitions and voted yes with the others. The reason the vote was put on the agenda was because House Speaker Kurt Daudt had it arranged according to one of the legislators on the committee. It is also the only explanation as most of the legislators on this 10 member conference committee were co-authors on the now removed bill to reign in the Met Council power.

Last month Speaker Daudt emailed me "Matt, Your posts are full of shit and you know it.  Is that clear enough for you?" in response to my article documenting the lack of leadership from Daudt to take a stand against mass transit: Four GOP Legislators are Silent After Attempt to Sneak Funding for Mass Transit in Omnibus Bill I had reminded him the party would be doomed in the 2018 election if the party can't get something as simple as to stop expanding failed mass transit.

No one is sure yet if Speaker Daudt will put his name in the running for Governor; if he is, I wonder what party he will run under. With his 9% budget increase offer to Dayton's 11% budget increase proposal and the pork filled Bonding bill, there's not a fiscal conservative I know of who's impressed with Daudt's leadership. 

Sunday, April 30, 2017

House & Senate Differ on Future of Met Council in Mass Transit. Billions at Stake.


Update: It appears the House and Senate agree'd to give the MetC an insane budget of $210 million! That's nearly Three and a half times higher than the house proposal of $61.5 million!
see post:
GOP Caves on Mass Transit, Offers Dayton Dream Budget for the Met Council to Continue Transit Lines















---------------------------------------------------------
Today, 5-1-2017, it's up to the ten legislators from the House and Senate on whether they are going to, for the first time in over ten years, slow the out of control expansion of white elephant mass transit. Yes, the 3 corridors in Washington County have not had direct state funding since 2011; however, the bloated budget of the Met Council has back door funded these corridors' progress along with the 11 other corridors that are either in planning or recently built.  (4 of 14 completed so far)
(according to "Session Daily" today is the deadline)

We covered why the legislators should accept the house version in our previous post:
GOP Senate Passes $5.8 Billion Transportation Bill with $180 Million to Met Council & Mass Transit a Huge Raise

This article is more evidence against the unelected Met Council who is now threatening to retaliate with the most painful cuts possible if they get a budget decrease. 

Today is the last day to urge the ten legislators to accept the House version of the omnibus bill, $61.5 million for Met Council as opposed to the Senate's insane offer of $180 million for their transportation budget. The Met C operating budget was less than $650 million in 2006. Last year it was just short of $1 BILLION DOLLARS! Most of their services are redundant to local city and county planning. Including but not limited to park planning, low income housing planning, water and sewer planning, "livable communities", and "growth planning."  According to Representative Nick Zerwas, the original intent of the Met C was simply to help neighboring metro cities plan utilities like water and sewer at their borders. 

In 2005 the State provided $57.3 million in funding for traditional bus service, metro mobility, express bus, and the one light rail train in operation. Subtract the $9.35 million the state provided to fund this transit line's horrible lack of self sustaining ridership (the blue line) and it shows all the core bus services only cost $43 million that year. Adjust for inflation and that is $51 million in 2017 dollars! (double for bi-annual cost)

There is ABSOLUTELY no reason the GOP house and GOP senate can not agree on the GENEROUS $61.5 million in the house version. Met C can do many things for savings and revenue such as: modestly raise fares, cut LRT service to support peak use, and actually enforce ticket purchase to make closer to the $106 million to match the FY '04/'05 budget... mind you, this number included millions in subsidy for LRT, not just core bus service.

$61.5 Million is crucial because with any extra the Met C will likely keep back door funding failed mass transit like they always have. The 3 corridors being planned in Washington County haven't had a cent in direct funding from the legislature since 2011. Yet, with this back door funding they're moved full steam ahead because of over funding from even the GOP Legislature. 

The deadline is Monday 5-1-2017. Again. Please email and call them with these facts to show citizens are informed and to not believe the lies of the Met C threatening to cut off grandma's Metro mobility with the most painful cuts they can. The unelected Met Council fears nothing except responsible funding. unfortunately the media is all to willing to let them get away lying and holding elderly and disabled transit funding hostage. It's apparently so bad not one of the ten legislators has responded to give assurances they'll stick to the lower offer.

If Minnesota families have to live within a budget than so should the Met C. The 80+ non-metro county citizens are tired of funding the metro's mass transit. Urge legislators to cut funding back to pre-white elephant mass transit and stop the unsustainable expansion of mass transit. 



Legislators to write:
rep.paul.torkelson@house.mn,
rep.john.petersburg@house.mn,
rep.jon.koznick@house.mn,
rep.jeff.howe@house.mn,
rep.linda.runbeck@house.mn,
sen.scott.newman@senate.mn,
sen.john.jasinski@senate.mn,
sen.mary.kiffmeyer@senate.mn,
sen.david.osmek@senate.mn,
sen.dan.sparks@senate.mn,


House: 
Torkelson 651-296-9303
Runbeck 651-296-2907
Petersburg 651-296-5368
Koznick 651-296-6926
Howe 651-296-4373
Senate: 
Newman 651-296-4131
Jasinski 651-296-0284
Kiffmeyer 651-296-5655
Osmek 651-296-1282
Sparks 651-296-9248

Friday, March 31, 2017

GOP Senate Passes $5.8 Billion Transportation Bill with $180 Million to Met Council & Mass Transit a Huge Raise



The $90 million a year ($180M total) from the general fund to the Met C is a raise of nearly $20 million according to the Met C's 2015 budget report that stated they received $82 million a year for transit from the General Fund. No one has contacted me to refute this data I believe is accurate.






---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last night on March 30th the 
4rth version of the $5.8 billion Senate Transportation Omnibus bill 
SF1060 passed 38-28. Today the House version is up for a vote. It's great legislators were able to pass a bill to support our "roads and bridges"; however, within it was hundreds of millions in NON-road and bridge related pork for the Met Council ($180 MILLION!), airports, bike paths, walking trails, radio communication, government buildings, and more. For weeks we have been asking GOP Senators (who hold the senate majority) to comment on this pork with no response. We also have received little feedback about the $1.6 billion dollar Senate bonding bill that is also full of pork. The only response is they will not be taking one cent out of the bill:


 $1.6 BILLION 2017 Bonding Bill. Legislators Say They Refuse to Cut Any Pork.

photo credit www.senate.mn

Thankfully where fiscal common  sense and respect for party principle lacks in the Senate GOP in every area of their bill, there is hope in the GOP controlled house version of this Transportation Omnibus Bill. However, it resides only in the significantly less funding for the Met C ($61.5 million vs the Senate's $180 million). This house companion bill to the senate's version is HF861. It is the 4rth and final version and up for a vote today. Some details could change before the approval with last minute amendments adding on even more pork. However, before either bill can move forward to the Governor's office they have to match. Here's some of the differences that stood out that I could find:

The Senate Transportation Omnibus bill SF1060 and it's 4rth version passed 38-28 yesterday:
$5.8 billion total.  All the sums are for spending over just two years (2018 &2019)
$180.6 million to the un-elected Metropolitan Council where historically HALF their budget or more is funneled WITHOUT legislative approval to build our failed Mass transit corridors that cost MN tax payers billions!
$54.4 million for Airports... (didn't realize subsidizing for profit airports was in the constitution as a core function of Government)
$41 million for agency management buildings (are they building roads or buildings for themselves?)

The House Transportation Omnibus Bill HF861 and it's 4rth and final version is up for a vote today:
$5.8 billion total. All the sums are for spending over just two years (2018 &2019)
$61.5 million for the un-elected Metropolitan Council... this lower number than $180 million from the senate is responsible because it will neutralize the over reaching power of Met Council for planning road corridors. More details here: Why One Body (MNDOT) to Run State Transportation Planning Would be Best for MN Taxpayers
$65.2 million for Airports... (Again, didn't realize subsidizing for profit airports was in the constitution as a core function of Government)
$57.9 million for agency management buildings (Again, are they building roads or buildings for themselves?)

The Senate's $180 million in funding to the Met Council is a $20 million dollar raise from the last funding for them. This is a slap in the face for fiscal conservatives who elected these GOP senators and have trusted them to do as they promised and take money and power from the Met Council. Representative Zerwas agrees, stating on AM1130 that the original reason and sole purpose the Met Council was originally founded was because the State didn't want Twin City's local governments building redundant sewer systems between each other!
My one small, blue collar, citizen run, not for profit, free, blog can not influence the Fiscal Conservative legislators to wake up and return to their principles they ran on to get elected. Only you can motivate them by contacting them. Please do so now and in the future.

we told the legislators:
"If you can't align against failed mass transit it's easy to predict a repeat of 2011 when the GOP did nothing to reform wasteful transit spending, the un-elected met council, and actually did the opposite and funded horrible transit lines like the Red Rock Corridor and Gateway Corridor with direct funding.... As you know the GOP lost the house and Senate the following year. When this session is again a failure to cut something simple as failed mass transit spending and Met Council reform I predict a similar defeat for the Republican legislature AND the Governor's seat." 

But don't lose hope in the republicans yet fiscal conservatives. 84 Republican legislators signed a letter to Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao to stop the two billion dollar SWLRT corridor that even rural democrats agree is waste of tax dollars.

Republican Representative Jerry Hertaus' comment he provided me several months ago summarizes the extreme waste our failed Transit system is:
"I don't think it was necessarily the legislature's intent to provide an unlimited open checkbook to subsidize at an "unkown" number of rail lines at an unkown cost. Extending the current losses funded by the legislature to the six additional proposed MetC lines would suggest (by my own calculations) the current $55 million of losses would triple to $165 million. This promises to be an endless obligation and when shouldered up against the talked about 10 year transportation funding plan, this would be a $1.65 billion dollar funding shortfall, not to mention a likely $12 BILLION dollars to construct the lines. This totals by my estimation, $13.65 billion for LRT over the next 10 years compared to $6 billion over the same period for all of our roads and bridges statewide. This is more than DOUBLE the expenditure for less than 3% of total ridership assuming the LRT ridership doubles over the same period. Further, these losses will starve the general fund for other constitutionally mandated responsibilities such as education, transportation, judiciary and public safety and will ultimately lead to yet higher taxes.



Vice Chair Rep. Petersburg Promises No Transit Bills in 2017 House Transportation Omnibus Bill

The fifth reading of this House transportation omnibus bill passed. It appears the bill is intact without major changes making the article below still accurate. Now the GOP lead Senate and the House have to find middle ground. The bill passed 76-54.
--------------------
The Senate version of the House Transportation Bill is
 SF1060 and it's 4rth version passed 38-28 yesterday on 3/30. Article here: GOP Senate Passes $5.8 Billion Transportation Bill with $180 Million to Met Council & Mass Transit a Huge Raise


This article is about the House Transportation Omnibus Bill HF861 and it's 4rth and final version that is up for a vote today 3/31. On 3/29 they heard petitions to add projects to the bill, 9 were mass transit bills. So I wrote our elected officials who oversee the 2017 Transportation Omnibus Bill these 5 questions. I got one response so far from Representative John Petersburg, Vice Chair of the House Transportation and Finance Committee.
photo credit MN House "Session Daily"

1.) Why are inappropriate "mass transit" bills proposed to be in a "transportation" (roads and bridges) omnibus bill? I've yet to meet a tax payer who didn't agree that failed mass transit bills should be stand alone bills and not hidden in any omnibus bill. 2.) Many of the 9 mass transit project bills proposed were just authored on March 20th... I thought the deadline was March 8th to author bills? 3.) The 9 mass transit bills, whether in the omnibus or not, COMPLETELY bypassed the checks and balances of committee hearings for citizens to comment with their outrage that the legislature would consider funding the continuation of these nightmares and even starting new lines! 4.) They're "not taking public comment" at this March 29th hearing that we just found out about on the 27th. We found with the omnibus bonding bills it's basically impossible to get a bill out once it's put in. No matter how bad of a bill it is: $1.6 BILLION 2017 Bonding Bill. Legislators Say They Refuse to Cut Any Pork.5.) If the elections of 2014 and 2016 have one thing to say for MN politics (republicans gained the House and later the Senate) it is voters are upset with the un-elected Met Council getting money like this to fund the corridors and it's time to stop building failed transit lines. How or when do you plan to stop all 9 of these transit bills from the over 50 bills proposed for this Omnibus bill? 

The process of an omnibus bill (a piece of legislation with dozens of similar funding requests, aka bills) becoming law is complicated to say the least. You can watch all the "School house Rock" videos on How a bill becomes a law and read all the articles you can and you'll still find it hard to understand it all because it's very unpredictable. This post is another attempt, as your blue collar, average Joe tax payer like you, to explain what I have discovered this session about our omnibus bills from my fiscal conservative point of view. I'm not a lobbyist. Nor do I, or this blog Washington County Watchdog, make money or gain anything, nor do we endorse anyone. In my last post I explained the ridiculous 2017 Senate Omnibus Bonding bill: $1.6 BILLION 2017 Bonding Bill. Legislators Say They Refuse to Cut Any Pork.

This article I write to explain my findings with the 2017 House Transportation Omnibus Bill that was just heard in an "informational" hearing on 3/29/17. As a fiscal conservative I watch our Washington County Legislators work at the Capital. As you may know, the Republicans have a majority in the House and the Senate now. Both chambers write and pass (or reject) bills "on the floor" with the requirement that they have matching language (or terms) before they go to the Governor to sign into Law. When republicans hold the majority of one side of the legislature the expectation of their constituents is that they author fiscally responsible bills. 

I was shocked to find the 2017 House Transportation (roads and bridges) Omnibus Bill was considering the addition of 9 Mass transit (light rail or bus) bills. This upsets fiscal conservatives because we believe in the original checks and balances design of the legislative process. That is, one bill, one vote. Where ideally each bill is presented and debated (if it survives committee hearings) and each is voted on as a "stand alone bill". However, that is not possible when you have a State with thousands of miles of highways so these similar transportation bills are put into one big omnibus. But it's not okay when legislators attempt to sneak unrelated bills into an unrelated omnibus bill. Coincidentally, four of our Washington County Republican Legislators have done just that (more later). 

All citizens benefit from state funded roads as not only personal transport, but also delivery of goods and services. Mass transit (light rail and bus rapid transit) do not benefit the residents of the state tax payers. At best, mass transit only serves residents along the short length of the corridors that are usually less than 20 miles long in Minnesota. They don't deliver goods and services and they don't transport you if you have more than you can carry on and off. Generous estimates state that only 4% of just Twin City metro commutes are by Mass Transit. Statewide, less than a fraction of 1%. So why should tax dollars meant for roads and bridges go to fund a transit line that statistically very few people use? 




There's over 50 Bills proposed for the 2017 House Transportation Omnibus bill; but these are the 9 mass transit bills that could have been hidden within:
The 9 transit bills have 33 authors. All except 4 of the authors are democrats who apparently do not understand the four corridors that have been built in Minnesota have cost tax payers billions yet have had no impact on decreasing road congestion or meeting expectations for job growth etc. The 4 republican authors are all from Washington County (The RINO (republican in name only) Representative Fenton, Senator Housley, Representative Jurgens (elected 2016), and Representative Franke (elected 2016)).

-HF2442(Ward)/SF1767 (Kent, Housley)- : $3 million for the Gateway Corridor Transitway funding   (more on Gateway corridor here)-HF2453 - (Fenton): $3 million for the Gateway Corridor Busway 
-HF2385 - (Franke, Jurgens)/SF2260 (Schoen): $5,600,000 to the Metropolitan Council for Red Rock Corridor transitway (more on Red Rock Corridor here)
-HF539 - (Fischer)/ SF463 (Hawj): $2,000,000 for Ramsey County; Rush Line Corridor Transitway funding  (Rush line corridor serves such a rural area it can barely justify the peak service express bus route up to Forest Lake etc. Yet they think we need a BRT corridor making multiple trips all day?)
-HF134 - (Mahoney, Fischer; Johnson, S.)/ SF89 (Hawj): Ramsey County;$1,000,000 for environmental analysis and design of track between Westminster Junction and Division Street/Hoffman Interlocking. East Metro Rail Corridor funding (more on the failed Union Depot not getting half the riders predicted 5 years ago)
-HF436 - (Carlson, Hausman; Slocum; Masin; Hornstein)/ SF202(Wiklund; Rest; Clausen) $9,750,000 is appropriated from the bond proceeds fund to the Metropolitan Council for the Mall of America Station on the Hiawatha Corridor light rail transit station improvement (a bigger better station isn't going to bring riders see North Star Corridor)-HF856 - (Pinto, Hausman; Youakim)/ SF1188(Cohen; Kent; Pappas): $2,000,000 for a grant to the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority for predesign and design activities of the Riverview Corridor Transitway from the Union Depot in the city of St. Paul to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport and the Mall of America in the city of Bloomington. (This corridor is such a bad idea it hasn't even got the time of day to really begin in the over 9 years CTIB has been around to approve new transit corridor builds)-HF590 - (Koegel; Bernardy; Slocum; Hilstrom; Murphy, M.; Nelson; Ecklund; Hornstein; Hausman; Hortman) SF176 (Newton; Hoffman): $1,000,000 to the Metropolitan Council for a grant to the Anoka County Regional Rail Authority for environmental analysis, design, engineering, negotiations with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, acquisition of real property or interests in real property, and construction of related infrastructure and other improvements of a capital nature for the Foley Boulevard Northstar commuter rail station. Anoka County; Foley Boulevard Northstar commuter rail station funding. (The $350 million dollar failure of the Northstar Corridor. Adding the multi-million dollar Ramsey station saw a 17% drop in ridership after construction (compare 2012 to 2013 MNDOT Guideway status report data), the multi-million dollar Fridley station also failed to boost the downward spiral of ridership, lower ticket prices, "free" rides to any and every major event like twins and vikings games and on holidays also failed... put a fork in this line and stop adding to it!)-HFXXXX (Haley) appropriating money for a study for the Chicago-Twin Cities passenger rail corridor; authorizing the sale and issuance of state bonds. (The Amtrak line to Chicago from Union depot is barely hanging on, so lets study another corridor just to be sure we know it's a failure?) 

we got one response so far from Representative John Petersburg, Vice Chair of the House Transportation and Finance Committee. His response was short, yet informative:

"I can tell you with certainty they will not be in the bill as it leaves the House.  Whereas there is never guarantees to anything at the capitol, I can tell you with some certainty, it would be hard for any one of them to make it into any other omnibus bills.  Since they haven't made deadline, they are generally dead for this year.  Hope that lowers your concern."

Expect a follow up article about our four Republican State Legislators authoring failed Mass transit bills. We sent them Four simple questions about their decision to do this and leaving them with the comment:

"I
f you can't align with the party against failed mass transit it's easy to predict a repeat of 2011 when the GOP did nothing to reform wasteful transit spending, the un-elected met council, and actually did the opposite and funded horrible transit lines like the Red Rock Corridor and Gateway Corridor with direct funding as your bills this session request.... As you know the GOP lost the house and Senate the following year. When this session is again a failure to cut something simple as failed mass transit spending and Met Council reform I predict a similar defeat for the Republican legislature AND the Governor's seat." 

But don't lose hope in the republicans yet fiscal conservatives. 84 Republican legislators signed a letter to Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao to stop the two billion dollar SWLRT corridor that even rural democrats agree is waste of tax dollars.

Republican Representative Jerry Hertaus' comment he provided me several months ago summarizes the extreme waste our failed Transit system is:
"I don't think it was necessarily the legislature's intent to provide an unlimited open checkbook to subsidize at an "unkown" number of rail lines at an unkown cost. Extending the current losses funded by the legislature to the six additional proposed MetC lines would suggest (by my own calculations) the current $55 million of losses would triple to $165 million. This promises to be an endless obligation and when shouldered up against the talked about 10 year transportation funding plan, this would be a $1.65 billion dollar funding shortfall, not to mention a likely $12 BILLION dollars to construct the lines. This totals by my estimation, $13.65 billion for LRT over the next 10 years compared to $6 billion over the same period for all of our roads and bridges statewide. This is more than DOUBLE the expenditure for less than 3% of total ridership assuming the LRT ridership doubles over the same period. Further, these losses will starve the general fund for other constitutionally mandated responsibilities such as education, transportation, judiciary and public safety and will ultimately lead to yet higher taxes.